Workbook page: 514
PDF page: 549
Section: No public section attached
Source status: source checked / public
LCMS 2026 Convention Workbook: Reports and Overtures, PDF page 549
Word in our midst at times move to other organizations or church bodies despite their being found unfit according to God’s clear standards, thus further scandalizing the Church and sowing confusion; therefore be it Resolved, That the Council of Presidents (COP) confer and compose a clear process by which the removal or resignation of called workers in the S ynod will be more clearly relayed to the wider Synod, taking into consideration Bylaw sections 2.13 and 2.17, with particular attention to Bylaw 2.13.2.1 (a–c); and be it further Resolved, That the COP , in their work, consider relaying the status of the called worker ( restricted, suspended, or under investigation) at the time of the removal or resignation. Circuit 20 (Mankato), Minnesota South District; Circuit 8 (Oklahoma City), Oklahoma District Ov. 10-25 To Request Council of Presidents to Clarify Circumstances of Called Worker Removal or Resignation from Roster WHEREAS, The Church, as instituted by her Lord Jesus Christ, publicly calls both commissioned and ordained ministers according to good order (Eph. 4:11–12); and W HEREAS, Every called worker solemnly promises to serve God’s people in accordance with Holy Scripture and with our Lutheran Confessions (LSB Agenda, 166, 212); and W HEREAS, Every called worker likewise promises to adorn the Gospel of Jesus Christ with a holy and godly life (ibid.); and WHEREAS, There is a public nature to the work undertaken by those who serve the Church (Matt. 5:16; Acts 20:28; 1 Peter 5:2–4), as such a task includes exemplifying the faith for those they serve to see and emulate; and W HEREAS, Though rare, shameful and scandalizing cases have arisen, in which called workers are found to be unfit according to the scriptural requirements (Rom. 12:3 –8; Col. 3:12 –17; 1 Tim. 3:1–7; 4:1– 5, 14 –16) of those serving in called positions in the Church, which require a removal or resignation from the office held; and WHEREAS, Such cases are publicized to the Church in a straightforward but question-inspiring manner, which gives way to justifiable curiosity, concern, and, worse, speculation or rumor; and WHEREAS, Those who have been removed or have resigned from called positions and from the roster that once qualified them to publicly teach God’s Word in our midst at times move to other organizations or church bodies despite their being found unfit according to God’s clear standards, thus further scandalizing the Church and sowing confusion; therefore be it Resolved, That the Council of Presidents (COP) confer and compose a process by which the removal or resignation of called workers from the roster of the Synod, and the nature thereof (e.g., false doctrine, immoral life, inability to serve —omitting details), will be more clearly relayed to the wider Synod, taking into consideration Bylaw sections 2.13 and 2.17, with particular attention to Bylaw 2.13.2.1 (a–c); and be it further Resolved, That the COP, in their work, consider relaying the status of the called worker ( restricted, suspended, or under investigation) at the time of the removal or resignation from the roster. Circuit 25 (Kenosha), South Wisconsin District; Circuit 26 (Racine), South Wisconsin District Ov. 10-26 To Amend Bylaw 2.13.3.2 to Make Restriction Appeals Public Record and to Allow Further Review Rationale A district president placed a pastor on restricted status. In response to the question, why was the letter written, the pastor replied, “to defend my children,” and referred to the scene in Braveheart where the man defended his wife. The letter was written five years prior , to someone else. The district president, a week later, felt threatened and publicly announced to the entire Synod that the pastor was placed on restricted status. In the appeal hearing with three other district presidents, unrecorded, the ruling was in favor of the first district president, even though he admitted he acted in violation of the Synod Constitution and normal practice by ruling on his own case (although the clause forbidding ruling on a matter where the district president was a party has since been removed), and rendering a judgment far in excess of the original offense. Therefore be it Resolved, That the entire appeal must be recorded, with a transcript given to the parties and placed in Synod and district files as a permanent public record; and be it further Resolved, That the Praesidium of the Synod ( the President and vice-presidents) have authority to review and discipline district presidents that violate their oath of office to uphold the Scriptures, Confessions, and Constitution of the Synod; and be it further Resolved, That Bylaw 2.13.3.2 be amended as follows: PRESENT/PROPOSED WORDING Removal of Restricted Status and Limitations … 2.13.3.2 Such petition for removal of restricted status shall be addressed solely to the Council of Presidents through the office of the President of the Synod. The Council of Presidents shall rule on such petition within six months from the date of receipt. … (e) The hearing before the panel shall be privatepublic, attended only by the parties and the witnesses who can substantiate the facts relevant to the matter in dispute. The panel shall establish the procedure to be followed in the hearing and the relevancy of evidence so that each party shall be given an opportunity fully to present its respective position. The entire appeal must be recorded, with a transcription given to the parties and placed in Synod and district files as a permanent public record. … (g) The decision of the hearing panel shall be the decision of the Council of Presidents and shallmay be final with nothe right of appeal to the Praesidium of the Synod that has authority to review and discipline district presidents that violate their oath of office to uphold the Scriptures, Confessions , and the Synod Constitution. Circuit 3 (Baltimore East) Southeastern District 2026 Convention Workbook 514 ECCLESIASTICAL SUPER VISION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION