Official Workbook PDF page source text

honors local and district judgments, promotes evangelical care, and builds trust rather than fear among pastors and congregations.

Our Savior, Arlington, VA; St. John’s, Alexandria, VA;

Trinity, Lexington Park, MD;

Circuit 8 (Washington, South), Southeastern District

Ov. 10-07

To Establish an Independent Appeals Panel in Cases involving the President’s Decisions

WHEREAS, Holy Scripture warns against partiality and instructs that accusations against elders be handled with great care and fairness (1 Tim. 5:19–21); and

WHEREAS, Our Lord teaches that judgment within the Church must be carried out with humility and awareness of our own sin (Matt. 7:1–5); and

WHEREAS, The Synod Constitution and Bylaws provide for due process and appeal in matters of ecclesiastical discipline, so that decisions may not rest solely on one person’s judgment; and

WHEREAS, It is a fundamental principle of justice and good order that one should not be the sole judge in his own case, nor should final appeals be structurally dependent on the very office whose decisions are being challenged; and

WHEREAS, In cases where the President of the Synod or his office is the originating or decisive authority in a disciplinary action, the perception that appeals are heard and decided by bodies closely tied to that same office can undermine confidence in the fairness and independence of the process; and

WHEREAS, For the sake of the consciences of pastors and congregations, it is beneficial that appeals in such cases be heard by an independent body clearly distinct from the Office of the President (OTP); therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod affirm the importance of genuine, independent appeals in cases of ecclesiastical discipline, especially where the decisions of the OTP are at issue; and be it further

Resolved, That the Synod direct the Commission on Handbook to propose b ylaw amendments establishing an Ecclesiastical Appeals Panel (or similarly named body) which:

• is appointed by the Council of Presidents (COP), with representation from across the Synod;

• includes both ordained ministers and laypersons known for their confessional fidelity and wisdom;

• does not include current staff of the OTP or current members of the Synod’s Board of Directors;

• has the responsibility to hear and adjudicate appeals in disciplinary cases in which the President or his office served as the final decision-maker at the first level;

and be it further

Resolved, That such bylaw amendments:

• provide that decisions of this appeals panel be issued in writing with stated reasons;

• specify whether and how such decisions may themselves be reviewed by a broader body (e.g., convention or COP by a defined supermajority), thereby ensuring both accountability and independence;

and be it further

Resolved, That the President of the Synod be encouraged, as a matter of evangelical practice even prior to formal bylaw amendment, to delegate the hearing and adjudication of appeals in cases directly involving his office’s decisions to an independent panel appointed by the COP; and be it finally

Resolved, That the Synod commend all who serve in supervisory offices to the Lord’s care, praying that such structural safeguards may assist them in carrying out their duties in a manner above reproach and worthy of the trust of Christ’s flock.

Our Savior, Arlington, VA; St. John’s, Alexandria, VA;

Trinity, Lexington Park, MD;

Circuit 8 (Washington, South), Southeastern District

Ov. 10-08

To Require Greater Transparency When Disciplinary Judgments Are Reversed

WHEREAS, Our Lord teaches that “everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed . B ut whoever does what is true comes to the light” (John 3:20–21); and

WHEREAS, The Eighth Commandment and its explanation in Luther’s Small and Large Catechisms call us both to protect our neighbor’s reputation and to speak truthfully and clearly; and

WHEREAS, The Constitution and Synod Bylaws provide for ecclesiastical supervision, discipline, and expulsion, including the possibility that earlier judgments may be revisited in light of further information; and

WHEREAS, When a matter has been carefully investigated and publicly described as resolved, and especially when that resolution has been communicated to the Synod at large, a subsequent reversal or reopening of the case without clear, substantive explanation can deeply trouble the consciences of pastors and congregations; and

WHEREAS, Vague references to “additional information” or similar phrases, when unaccompanied by a basic explanation of the nature of the concerns and the reasons for reversal, can undermine confidence in both the fairness and the evangelical character of ecclesiastical supervision; therefore be it

Resolved, That the Synod affirm the importance of transparency and clear communication in matters of ecclesiastical discipline, while still honoring legitimate needs for confidentiality and protection of reputations; and be it further

Resolved, That the Synod direct the Commission on Handbook to review and propose amendments to the bylaws relating to ecclesiastical supervision and discipline, such that:

• whenever a prior written conclusion or public statement regarding the resolution of a disciplinary matter is later reversed or superseded by a significantly different action (e.g., removal from the roster, suspension, or public censure), the authority reversing the decision must provide a written rationale to the pastor, the congregation, the district president, and the Council of Presidents, summarizing in general terms:

• the nature of the additional or newly weighted concerns;

and • the reasons why the earlier resolution is no longer judged sufficient; and 2026 Convention Workbook

504 ECCLESIASTICAL SUPER VISION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION