Workbook page: 255
PDF page: 290
Section: No public section attached
Source status: source checked / public
LCMS 2026 Convention Workbook: Reports and Overtures, PDF page 290
2026 Convention Workbook 255 THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS —COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS /two.lnum/one.lnum The Lutheran Church/emdash.lnumMissouri Synod of pre-packaged elements invites confusion and can encourage bad practices. As noted above, such usage seems to invite some churches to adopt specific practices that undermine or prevent the practice of closed Communion and may also create questions about what has or has not been consecrated. Consequently, such a prac- tice may under some circumstances create doubts that may cause communicants to be unsure that they are receiving Christ’s body and blood and therefore to re- frain from reception. For these reasons, we believe the Synod should discourage their future use. This judgment does not in any way seek to condemn those pastors and congrega- tions that, according to their best judgment during the confusion of the COVID-19 pandemic, made use of the packets. Nevertheless, we believe that the potential for confusion and bad practice outweighs any potential benefit. The great treasure that is Christ’s Holy Supper should not be discounted in place of uncertain at- tempts to avoid disease. Moreover, if we emphasize worries about the potential for disease transmission, public worship itself would be viewed as a possible threat to physical well-being because of the constant presence of influenza, continuing out- breaks of COVID-19, and other contagions. Our deepest concern as Christians is not threats to the body, but threats to our soul. Jesus rightly admonishes us about the danger of living in fear of this world’s threats and ignoring God (Matt. 10:28). A risk to the spiritual well-being of those who would be uncertain of the Sacrament should rank above the unlikelihood that Communion will endanger us physically. /two.lnum/two.lnum Proper Administration of the Lord’s Supper SUBSTITUTION OF NON-WHEAT BREAD FOR WHEAT BREAD Biblical and Historical Background The question of the propriety of using bread made from grains other than wheat is largely a result of requests by individuals who suffer from celiac disease or another form of gluten intolerance. Although celiac disease was diagnosed as early as the second century AD, it was given little study or medical treatment until the 1800s. 27 Both celiac disease (CD) and non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGS) have garnered increasing attention in recent years. The World Journal of Gastroenterology (WJG ) says that “currently, 1% of the United States population holds a diagnosis for celiac disease (CD), however, a more recently recognized and possibly related condition, ‘non-celiac gluten sensitivity’ (NCGS) has been suggested to affect up to 6% of the United States public.” 28 In addition to those with such diagnoses, a significantly higher number of Americans—about 20% of the population—have chosen to adopt a gluten-free diet without either a CD or NCGS diagnosis. 29 This has led to concerns about the Sacrament, since wheat hosts or bread have been used almost exclusively for generations. By the late twentieth century non-gluten hosts were offered to churches as an alternative to wheat hosts for use in cases of CD or other gluten intolerance. Significant numbers of LCMS churches offer non-gluten hosts 27 See “History of Celiac Disease,” Beyond Celiac, https://www.beyondceliac.org/celiac-disease/ celiac-history/ (accessed September 17, 2024). The death rate for untreated celiac children is about 30 percent. Because of high rates of child mortality, the fact that celiac victims tended to be children may have prevented scientific attention until more recent times. 28 Samuel O. Igbinedion et al., “Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: All Wheat Attack Is Not Celiac,” WJG 23, no. 40 (2017): 7201–10, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29142467/. 29 Igbinedion, et al. /two.lnum/three.lnum The Lutheran Church/emdash.lnumMissouri Synod to those who request them. Hence the question of their propriety has been raised in 2023 Res. 5-15. Regarding the bread of the Lord’s Supper, this is what we have been given in Scripture: Matthew 26:26 – “Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, ‘Take, eat; this is My body.’” Mark 14:22 – “And as they were eating, He took bread, and after blessing it broke it and gave it to them, and said, ‘Take; this is My body.’” Luke 22:19 – “And He took bread, and when He had given thanks, He broke it and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is My body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of Me.’” 1 Corinthians 11:23–24 – “For I received from the Lord what I also deliv- ered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when He was betrayed took bread, and when He had given thanks, He broke it, and said, ‘This is My body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of Me.’” In each of the passages, the text shows that Jesus took “bread” with a blessing or thanksgiving, and distributed it to the disciples with the words “This is My body.” The concern the CTCR has here been asked to address is whether it is consistent with our Lord’s “Do this” for congregations to use “non-wheat hosts” in the Lord’s Supper. That is, since the Lord took “bread” as one of the elements of the Lord’s Supper, is bread made from something other than wheat a valid earthly element? The Confessions simply describe Christ’s instruction: “For Christ gives this com- mand at the table and at supper. There is certainly no doubt that He speaks of real, natural bread and of natural wine. Also, He speaks of oral eating and drinking” (FC SD VII 48). Therefore, consistent with our response in the matter of substituting grape juice for wine, we should state at the outset that using something other than “natural bread” would not be in keeping with our Lord’s words. The Greek word translated as “bread” in the four passages cited is artos. For bibli- cal studies, Greek lexicons (dictionaries) provide definitions by summarizing the /two.lnum/four.lnum Proper Administration of the Lord’s Supper usage of a word in the ancient world during both the period of Classical Greek lit- erature and later, more common (Koine) biblical and early church literature. The definitions for artos vary somewhat in the dictionaries but can be summarized: In Classical Greek when artos appears without a modifier it seems to have referred to wheat bread almost exclusively; however, the definition broadened to become the general term for all bread in the Koine period. 30 The Bible knows different grains and breads. Wheat and wheat bread are most fre- quently mentioned (over fifty times), but barley and bread made from barley are also mentioned frequently (more than thirty times). As for other types of grain, the only certain reference of bread made from them is the passage in Ezekiel 4:9, where the Lord commands the prophet to make bread from a mixed flour con- taining wheat, barley, beans, lentil, millet, and emmer. The term “bread” ( lehem in Hebrew, artos in Greek) is far more common than specific terms such as “wheat bread” or “barley bread.” It is used over two hundred times in the Old Testament and nearly one hundred times in the New Testament. “Bread” can mean a loaf, a cake, or a wafer—although when the wafer is unleavened bread in the Old Testa- ment the term matzah rather than lehem is typical. Bread is further used in ways that go beyond the literal. Since bread was the staple in the diet of the biblical world, the Bible also can use “bread” as shorthand for food or nourishment (e.g., Prov. 6:8; Lam. 1:11; Ezek. 18:16; Matt. 6:11; Luke 14:15; 15:17; 2 Thess. 3:12). Reference to bread being broken is connected with the bless- ing of the meal by the head of the household and the subsequent distribution of food. This is also, of course, the sense in the four Lord’s Supper narratives. The combination of breaking and bread in Luke and Acts seems to indicate partaking of a meal in some cases (Luke 24:35; Acts 2:46; 20:11), but it may refer to the Lord’s Supper (Acts 20:7). Certainly “the bread that we break” in 1 Corinthians 10:16 re- fers to the Supper. There is further usage of the term “bread” beyond any reference to normal grain bread. Note the connection with manna, “bread from heaven” (Ex. 16:4, 8; Psalm 30 Several dictionaries can be consulted: Henry George Liddell et al., eds., A Greek-English Lexicon , 9th rev. ed. (Oxford University Press, 1996); James Diggle et al., eds., The Cambridge Greek Lexicon, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 2021); Johannes Behm, “ artos,” in Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, eds. Gerhard Kittel and Gerhard Friedrich, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Eerdmans, 1964); Walter Bauer et al., eds., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (University of Chicago Press, 2000).