Workbook page 255

Official Workbook PDF page source text

This page reproduces mechanically extracted source text for source navigation. Check the official Convention Workbook PDF for final formatting and authority.

This site is an independent delegate research and preparation tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, authorized by, or officially connected to The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod or any other organization unless explicitly stated. All official convention information should be verified with official LCMS convention resources and the Convention Workbook.

Workbook page: 255

PDF page: 290

Section: No public section attached

Source status: source checked / public

LCMS 2026 Convention Workbook: Reports and Overtures, PDF page 290

2026 Convention Workbook
255
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS  —COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
/two.lnum/one.lnum
The Lutheran Church/emdash.lnumMissouri Synod
of pre-packaged elements invites confusion and can encourage bad practices. As 
noted above, such usage seems to invite some churches to adopt specific practices 
that undermine or prevent the practice of closed Communion and may also create 
questions about what has or has not been consecrated. Consequently, such a prac-
tice may under some circumstances create doubts that may cause communicants 
to be unsure that they are receiving Christ’s body and blood and therefore to re-
frain from reception. For these reasons, we believe the Synod should discourage 
their future use.
This judgment does not in any way seek to condemn those pastors and congrega-
tions that, according to their best judgment during the confusion of the COVID-19 
pandemic, made use of the packets. Nevertheless, we believe that the potential for 
confusion and bad practice outweighs any potential benefit. The great treasure 
that is Christ’s Holy Supper should not be discounted in place of uncertain at-
tempts to avoid disease. Moreover, if we emphasize worries about the potential for 
disease transmission, public worship itself would be viewed as a possible threat to 
physical well-being because of the constant presence of influenza, continuing out-
breaks of COVID-19, and other contagions. Our deepest concern as Christians is 
not threats to the body, but threats to our soul. Jesus rightly admonishes us about 
the danger of living in fear of this world’s threats and ignoring God (Matt. 10:28). 
A risk to the spiritual well-being of those who would be uncertain of the Sacrament 
should rank above the unlikelihood that Communion will endanger us physically. 
/two.lnum/two.lnum
Proper Administration of the Lord’s Supper
SUBSTITUTION 
OF NON-WHEAT BREAD 
FOR WHEAT BREAD
Biblical and Historical Background
The question of the propriety of using bread made from grains other than wheat is 
largely a result of requests by individuals who suffer from celiac disease or another 
form of gluten intolerance. Although celiac disease was diagnosed as early as the 
second century AD, it was given little study or medical treatment until the 1800s.
27
Both celiac disease (CD) and non-celiac gluten intolerance (NCGS) have garnered 
increasing attention in recent years. The World Journal of Gastroenterology (WJG )
says that “currently, 1% of the United States population holds a diagnosis for celiac 
disease (CD), however, a more recently recognized and possibly related condition, 
‘non-celiac gluten sensitivity’ (NCGS) has been suggested to affect up to 6% of the 
United States public.”
28 In addition to those with such diagnoses, a significantly 
higher number of Americans—about 20% of the population—have chosen to 
adopt a gluten-free diet without either a CD or NCGS diagnosis.
29 This has led to 
concerns about the Sacrament, since wheat hosts or bread have been used almost 
exclusively for generations. By the late twentieth century non-gluten hosts were 
offered to churches as an alternative to wheat hosts for use in cases of CD or other 
gluten intolerance. Significant numbers of LCMS churches offer non-gluten hosts 
27 See “History of Celiac Disease,” Beyond Celiac, https://www.beyondceliac.org/celiac-disease/
celiac-history/ (accessed September 17, 2024). The death rate for untreated celiac children is about 
30 percent. Because of high rates of child mortality, the fact that celiac victims tended to be children 
may have prevented scientific attention until more recent times.
28  Samuel O. Igbinedion et al., “Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity: All Wheat Attack Is Not Celiac,” WJG  23, 
no. 40 (2017): 7201–10, https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29142467/.
29  Igbinedion, et al.
/two.lnum/three.lnum
The Lutheran Church/emdash.lnumMissouri Synod
to those who request them. Hence the question of their propriety has been raised 
in 2023 Res. 5-15.
Regarding the bread of the Lord’s Supper, this is what we have been given 
in Scripture:
Matthew 26:26 – “Now as they were eating, Jesus took bread, and after 
blessing it broke it and gave it to the disciples, and said, ‘Take, eat; this is 
My body.’”
Mark 14:22 – “And as they were eating, He took bread, and after blessing 
it broke it and gave it to them, and said, ‘Take; this is My body.’”
Luke 22:19 – “And He took bread, and when He had given thanks, He 
broke it and gave it to them, saying, ‘This is My body, which is given for 
you. Do this in remembrance of Me.’”
1 Corinthians 11:23–24 – “For I received from the Lord what I also deliv-
ered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when He was betrayed took 
bread, and when He had given thanks, He broke it, and said, ‘This is My 
body, which is for you. Do this in remembrance of Me.’”
In each of the passages, the text shows that Jesus took “bread” with a blessing or 
thanksgiving, and distributed it to the disciples with the words “This is My body.”
The concern the CTCR has here been asked to address is whether it is consistent 
with our Lord’s “Do this” for congregations to use “non-wheat hosts” in the Lord’s 
Supper. That is, since the Lord took “bread” as one of the elements of the Lord’s 
Supper, is bread made from something other than wheat a valid earthly element? 
The Confessions simply describe Christ’s instruction: “For Christ gives this com-
mand at the table and at supper. There is certainly no doubt that He speaks of real, 
natural bread and of natural wine. Also, He speaks of oral eating and drinking” (FC 
SD VII 48). Therefore, consistent with our response in the matter of substituting 
grape juice for wine, we should state at the outset that using something other than 
“natural bread” would not be in keeping with our Lord’s words.
The Greek word translated as “bread” in the four passages cited is artos. For bibli-
cal studies, Greek lexicons (dictionaries) provide definitions by summarizing the 
/two.lnum/four.lnum
Proper Administration of the Lord’s Supper
usage of a word in the ancient world during both the period of Classical Greek lit-
erature and later, more common (Koine) biblical and early church literature. The 
definitions for artos vary somewhat in the dictionaries but can be summarized: In 
Classical Greek when artos appears without a modifier it seems to have referred to 
wheat bread almost exclusively; however, the definition broadened to become the 
general term for all bread in the Koine period.
30
The Bible knows different grains and breads. Wheat and wheat bread are most fre-
quently mentioned (over fifty times), but barley and bread made from barley are 
also mentioned frequently (more than thirty times). As for other types of grain, 
the only certain reference of bread made from them is the passage in Ezekiel 4:9, 
where the Lord commands the prophet to make bread from a mixed flour con-
taining wheat, barley, beans, lentil, millet, and emmer. The term “bread” ( lehem in 
Hebrew, artos in Greek) is far more common than specific terms such as “wheat 
bread” or “barley bread.” It is used over two hundred times in the Old Testament 
and nearly one hundred times in the New Testament. “Bread” can mean a loaf, a 
cake, or a wafer—although when the wafer is unleavened bread in the Old Testa-
ment the term matzah rather than lehem is typical.
Bread is further used in ways that go beyond the literal. Since bread was the staple 
in the diet of the biblical world, the Bible also can use “bread” as shorthand for 
food or nourishment (e.g., Prov. 6:8; Lam. 1:11; Ezek. 18:16; Matt. 6:11; Luke 14:15; 
15:17; 2 Thess. 3:12). Reference to bread being broken is connected with the bless-
ing of the meal by the head of the household and the subsequent distribution of 
food. This is also, of course, the sense in the four Lord’s Supper narratives. The 
combination of breaking and bread in Luke and Acts seems to indicate partaking 
of a meal in some cases (Luke 24:35; Acts 2:46; 20:11), but it may refer to the Lord’s 
Supper (Acts 20:7). Certainly “the bread that we break” in 1 Corinthians 10:16 re-
fers to the Supper.
There is further usage of the term “bread” beyond any reference to normal grain 
bread. Note the connection with manna, “bread from heaven” (Ex. 16:4, 8; Psalm 
30  Several dictionaries can be consulted: Henry George Liddell et al., eds., A Greek-English Lexicon , 9th 
rev. ed. (Oxford University Press, 1996); James Diggle et al., eds., The Cambridge Greek Lexicon, vol. 
1 (Cambridge University Press, 2021); Johannes Behm, “ artos,” in Theological Dictionary of the New 
Testament, eds. Gerhard Kittel and Gerhard Friedrich, trans. Geoffrey W. Bromiley (Eerdmans, 1964); 
Walter Bauer et al., eds., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian 
Literature, 3rd ed. (University of Chicago Press, 2000).

Pause and Pray at 3:07 p.m.

At 3:07 each day, remember John 15:7 and pray for Christ's Church, the convention, our leaders, and the work of the Gospel among us.

Prayer page