Official Workbook PDF page source text

LCMS 2026 Convention Workbook: Reports and Overtures, PDF page 265

2026 Convention Workbook
230 
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS  —COMMISSION ON THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
Way Forward
Detailed Framework
Page 46 of 50
Article 6 – The Ministry
6.2 The Pastor of the Parish shall be a man1 whose soundness in faith, aptness to 
teach, and other qualifications for office have been examined and 
approved by the Church in accordance with the Scriptures and Confessions 
of the Church regarding the public office of the ministry. 
1 Parishes may modify this article to include ‘or woman’.
Article 9.3 – Parish Council
9.3.1 The Pastor, by virtue of his the office, shall attend all meetings of the Parish 
Council.
Article 9.6 – Officers and Committees
9.6.12 The Pastor, by virtue of his the office, shall have the right to attend all 
meetings of the committees.
Way Forward
Detailed Framework
Page 47 of 50
Appendix 1. DSTO 1A Theses of Agreement, The status of 
the Theses of Agreement and other doctrinal statements, 
CTICR, 1975
1. In the exercise of their teaching function, whether dealing with a group or a congregation or 
with individuals, pastors of the LCA should not run counter to the letter and the spirit of the 
Theses of Agreement. 
2. The Theses of Agreement, the fruit of prayerful labours extending over many years, have been 
adopted in all seriousness and in good faith by both the former UELCA and ELCA as a unifying 
document. They should be respected and treated accordingly. Should amendments 
become desirable in the course of time, such amendments would have to be submitted to 
the entire Church after thorough theological examination and discussion. Meanwhile, a 
deliberate disregard of the Theses in teaching and preaching would appear as evidence of 
bad faith, and would constitute a serious threat to the unity of the Church. There may, of 
course, be inadvertent disregard of the Theses due to ignorance of their content. 
3. It is clearly the right and the duty of the Church, in the face of current challenges, to define 
how it understands the Scriptures and the Confessions. Therefore, explanations and 
amendments of the Theses, as well as any other statements of a doctrinal nature, submitted 
to the entire Church after thorough theological examination and discussion and adopted by 
it, must be accorded the same authority in the Church as the Theses themselves (see 1 and 2 
above). 
Way Forward
Detailed Framework
Page 48 of 50
Appendix 2. DSTO 1A Theses of Agreement, The permanent 
status of Theses of Agreement, CTICR, 1976
As the name of the document indicates, the Theses of Agreement were written and adopted to 
bring about a consensus, in those doctrines of the Church and in those areas of churchly 
practice in which there had been actual or supposed disagreement and divisio n between the 
two former Lutheran Churches in Australia. The theses are therefore the official record of the 
outcome and the conclusion of the dialogue and debate between those two Churches as they 
sought a solution under the guidance of the Word of God to those doctrinal differences that 
divided them. They were therefore the instrument through which church fellowship and fraternal 
relationships between the two Churches were established. 
However, in many respects the Theses of Agreement exhibit the marks of confessional 
statements as Lutherans understand them. The Theses claim to be a fair and accurate exposition 
of the Word of God and in particular of the doctrine of the Gospel, as it is understood and 
preached and taught in the Lutheran Church of Australia. At the same time they explicitly 
express a complete consensus with the Lutheran fathers and reaffirm their exposition and 
understanding of God’s Word as contained in the Book of Concord, and together with them 
also reject all heresies that are condemned in the Lutheran Confessions. 
Like all confessional statements, the Theses of Agreement are always under the authority of the 
Word of God, and therefore there must always be a readiness to submit them to the critical 
scrutiny of God’s Word and accordingly confirm them, or amend or repudiate them when 
further study of God’s Word shows them to be inadequate or in error.  
In that sense their permanent status and authority are entirely determined by the faithfulness 
and accuracy with which they reflect the teaching of God’s Word, in particular the doctrine of 
the Gospel. 
All this, however, does not elevate the Theses of Agreement to the level of the Lutheran 
Confessions. A Church cannot claim to be Lutheran if it does not subscribe to the Book of 
Concord, or at least hold to the Confessions in the manner referred to in The ses of Agreement IX 
9; on the other hand, the absence of subscription to the Theses of Agreement certainly cannot 
call into doubt the Lutheran character of a Church that subscribes to the Book of Concord. The 
purpose and intention of the Theses of Agreement is related specifically to the Lutheran Church 
of Australia, and the permanency of their status therefore rests with this Church.
Way Forward
Detailed Framework
Page 49 of 50
Appendix 3. DSTO 1A Theses of Agreement, I:  Principles 
governing church fellowship
1. We believe that the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are the infallible
Word of God, written by inspiration of God, 2 Tim 3:16, by the holy men of God,   
2 Pet 1:21, as the Spirit gave them utterance, Acts 2:4. 
2. We believe that the canonical books of the Old and New Testaments are the infallible
and only source and norm of Christian doctrine and the sure and authoritative guide for 
life and practice. 2 Tim 3:15–17; 1 Cor 14:37; Psalm 119:160, etc. 
3. We agree that for church fellowship the uniting churches must be one in the
acceptance of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments, as the inspired Word 
of God and as the only and true source, norm, rule, and standard of all teaching and 
practice in the Christian Church.
4. a. We believe that where differences in teaching and practice exist or arise between 
churches uniting, these differences are to be removed by willingly submitting to the 
authority of the Word of God. Where a difference in teaching or practice is a departure 
from the doctrine of the Bible, such difference cannot be tolerated, but must be pointed 
out as an error, on the basis of clear passages of Holy Writ; and if the error is persisted in, 
in spite of instruction, warning, and earnest witness, it must at last lead to a separation.
b. We believe that all doctrines of Holy Writ are equally binding; nevertheless not all 
things in Scripture are of the same importance, when viewed from the centre and core 
of the Scriptures, Christ and justification by Him through faith.
c. We admit that there are some things hard to be understood in Holy Writ,2 Pet 3:16; but 
no doctrine can be based on Scripture passages that are not clear, especially if no light 
is thrown upon them by clear passages.
d. Differences in exegesis that do not affect doctrine are not church divisive.
e. In case of differences in exegesis that affect doctrine, agreement on the basis of 
God’s Word must be sought by combined, prayerful examination of the passage or 
passages in question.
If this does not lead to agreement, because no unanimity has been reached on the 
clarity of the passage or passages in question and hence on the stringency and 
adequacy of the Scriptural proof, divergent views arising from such differences of 
interpretation are not divisive of church fellowship, providing that
i. there be the readiness in principle to submit to the authority of the Word of God;
ii. thereby no clear Word of Scripture is denied, contradicted or ignored;
iii. such divergent views in no wise impair, infringe upon, or violate the central 
doctrine of Holy Scripture, justification by grace through faith in Jesus Christ;
iv. nothing be taught contrary to the publica doctrina of the Lutheran Church as laid 
down in its Confessions;
v. such divergent views are not propagated as the publica doctrina of the Church 
and in no wise impair the doctrine of Holy Writ.