Workbook page: 147
PDF page: 182
Section: No public section attached
Source status: source checked / public
LCMS 2026 Convention Workbook: Reports and Overtures, PDF page 182
2026 Convention Workbook 147 OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS1 2023 Res. 9-06A Task Force1 To Evaluate Electoral Circuit Parameters2 Whitepaper I3 John W. Sias, Secretary4 September 9, 2024 (Revised October 4, 2024)5 This whitepaper is intended to supplement the historical context found in the rationale of 2023 Res. 9-06A 6 (Proc., pp. 206–9) with statistical and historical data generally informative for the task force’s early work. It 7 intends to cover the following areas:8 1. A description of electoral and visitation circuits today, statistically and historically considered9 2. A brief characterization of current electoral circuits10 3. An overview of confirmed membership change and variation therein throughout the Synod11 4. A historical overview of selected recent changes to formation requirements and procedures of 12 circuits, visitation and electoral, that have been proposed in relatively recent Synod convention 13 overtures (supplementing the changes made over time, detailed in the charging resolution)14 5. A study of the potential effect on Synod convention size and representation changethat could occur 15 in a number of hypothetical proposals of various configurations16 6. A study of alternate requirements for electoral circuit formation, including a parish rather than 17 congregation basis and addition of an installed, non-SMP pastor requirement18 7. A study of c odependent bounds for electoral circuit formation, in which circuits with a surplus of 19 congregations can have a deficit of members and vice-versa20 8. Basic contextual data on member congregations and pastors in the circuits of the Synod21 These data are, of course, not exhaustive of the material or perspectives the task force may need to consider, 22 but they are intended to offer a well-considered starting point for the task force’s work. 23 1. Electoral and Visitation Circuits Today, Statistically and Historically Considered24 Since the 1969 convention of the Synod(due to 1967 Res. 5-18), electoral circuits have consisted of “either one 25 or two1 adjacent visitation circuits,2 as shall be determined by the district board of directors on the basis of 26 the following requirements: each pair of delegates shall represent from 7 to 20 member congregations, 27 involving an aggregate confirmed membership ranging from 1,500 to 10,0003” (Bylaw 3.1.2 [a]).28 “Exceptions to these requirements may be made only by the President of the Synod upon a request of a 29 district board of directors” (Bylaw 3.1.2 [b]). Since 1998, the proportion of electoral circuits allowed to stand 30 due to granted exceptions has ranged from 3% and 9%, in 1998 and 2001, respectively, to 14% in 2004, 31 hovering between 10 –12% since, with the exception of a low 7% exception ratio in 2016. Bylaws neither32 specify any underlying basis upon which these exceptions are to be evaluated, nor specify any limitation on 33 1 In a few cases, three adjacent, in an exception not allowed for explicitly in Bylaw 3.1.2 but inferred as one of the possible grantable exceptions. 2 The visitation circuits themselves are established by districts (that is, by district conventions, unless a district convention has explicitly authorized a district board of directors to carry this out) “according to geographical criteria.” There is technically no lower or upper limit (other than practical ones) on the size of a visitation circuit, other than that one should ordinarily not exceed the upper bound for the related electoral circuit, either in number of confirmed members or of member congregations, and that it should take no more than two adjacent visitation circuits to form one electoral circuit. Practical limits, lower and upper, may be inferred from the functions—important in their own right—described in Bylaw chapter 5. 3 It has proven in some instances not possible, when assembling electoral circuits, to satisfy a lower bound (for example, on confirmed members) without transgressing an upper bound (number of member congregations) or combining more than two visitation circuits. While the “overage” exceptions are exceptional circuits, it is the “underage” exceptions that have been the principal concern. In this whitepaper, exceptions may be assumed to include only the “underage” exceptions (fewer than 7 member congregations or 1,500 confirmed members), unless the “overage” exceptions are explicitly mentioned. 2 their number. This has contributed to at least one significant and damaging controversy, related to the 2004 1 convention (See R1-8-01 and Addendum 1, 2007 Workbook, pp. 14–18). 2 Supposing that no circuits are realigned or recombined from their 2023 configurations, and assuming a 3 uniform 8% triennial drop in confirmed membership (see below), we anticipate that 22% of 2023 electoral 4 circuits would require exceptions for the 2026 convention (based on SY2022 data, one year newer than that 5 used to validate the 2023 circuits, 15% already are exceptional, compared to the 11% that were a year before).6 Some macro-level historical context will be valuable. While changes to the original, 1872 representational 7 formula of “between two and seven congregations” attempted in 1893 and made in 1917 (to “ five and ten”) 8 and 1944 (to “ten and fifteen”) were to control the burgeoning size of the Synod convention in a growing 9 Synod, the 1967 changes had the principal effect of aligning visitation and electoral circuits across the Synod 10 (these were already fully aligned, following 1917 guidance, in about a third of the districts) and a secondary 11 effect of somewhat increasing the convention size. The 1969 convention met with delegates from 478 12 domestic electoral circuits, 4 representing 5,486 member congregations and 1,877,799 confirmed members 13 (1968 Statistical Yearbook), an increase from 424 domestic electoral circuits in 1967, under the 1944 rule.14 For comparison, the 2023 convention allowed for delegates from 532 electoral circuits, 475 meeting the 15 requirements and 57 having “underage” exceptions. These 532 electoral circuits represented 5,775 member 16 congregations and 1,395,076 confirmed members.17 Figure 1 provides some recent historical context, 1998 –2023. The line graphs indicate the number of 18 confirmed members in the Synod divided by 1,500 (the lower bound for electoral circuit formation; for 19 comparison, in 1968, this figure would have been 1,252, slightly below 1998’s 1,301) and the number of 20 member congregations divided by 7 (again, the lower bound; for comparison, the 1968 figure was 783).21 4 This number excludes, in the interest of comparability, three Canadian districts and the Argentina/Brazil District, all of which have become independent church bodies since (with the exception of certain Canadian congregations remaining in the English and SELC Districts. There were at least 490 domestic electoral circuits in 1971 and 503 in 1973, changes roughly proportional to the confirmed member growth of the Synod in the period. Figure 1: Trends in LCMS Electoral Circuits, 1998–2023 Conventions 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1998 2001 2004 2007 2010 2013 2016 2019 2023 Circuits and Congregations / 7 and Confirmed Members / 1500 Regular Except ? Except < M Except < C Except < C < M Combined w/ Adjacent(s) Congs/7 ConfMbrs/1500 R59.1