Report

R2.1 Colloquy Committee for Pastoral Ministry

Official Workbook report source text. No analysis has been added.

This site is an independent delegate research and preparation tool. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, authorized by, or officially connected to The Lutheran Church--Missouri Synod or any other organization unless explicitly stated. All official convention information should be verified with official LCMS convention resources and the Convention Workbook.

Official Workbook report source text

Official Workbook source-navigation report record. No analysis has been added.

Report number/id
R2.1
Report title
R2.1 Colloquy Committee for Pastoral Ministry
Workbook start page
38
Workbook end page
40
Source pages
38, 39, 40
Source status
source_checked
Committee
Not available
R2.1
Colloquy Committee for Pastoral Ministry
Pastoral colloquy is the process by which a man who has served 
as a pastor in another church body or trained for the pastoral min-
istry in a non-LCMS seminary while being a member of another 
church body can be declared qualified for a first call in the Synod.
By means of colloquy, the Synod vets and provides pastors for 
the LCMS—over and above those men trained by our two semi-
naries—thus indirectly supporting the third objective of the LCMS 
to “recruit and train pastors … and provide opportunity for their 
continuing growth” (Constitution Article III 3). Colloquy is also 
one way that the Synod “work[s] in support of and on behalf of 
congregations to assist them in carrying out their ministries” (By-
law 1.1.1). Lastly, colloquy supports the first, second, and fourth of 
the seven mission priorities that the 2023 Synod convention adopt-
ed for this triennium (Resolution 4-03), namely, 
to “plant, sustain, 
and revitalize Lutheran churches,” to “support and expand theo-
logical education,” and to “collaborate with the Synod’s mem-
bers and partners to enhance mission effectiveness.”
The Colloquy Committee for Pastoral Ministry (CCPM) admin-
isters the colloquy process by establishing policy, receiving 
and reviewing applications, conducting in-person interviews, and 
deciding on each applicant based on the application and interview. 
Bylaw 3.10.2 governs the process. Applicants can be certified imme-
diately, declined certification, or assigned one or more of the fol-
lowing: supplemental seminary coursework, mentored readings, a 
traditional vicarage, or a shorter, less-formal internship. 
A. Committee Composition and Turnover
The composition of the CCPM is stipulated in Bylaw 3.10.2.1, 
which states that, in addition to the LCMS First Vice-President, the 
committee “shall consist of … a district president appointed by the 
Council of Presidents, and the presidents of the seminaries or their 
representatives.” 
This triennium saw significant turnover on the committee, with 
three of its four members replaced. Concordia Seminary President 
Dr. Tom Egger replaced Dr. Glenn Nielsen in September 2023, 
Concordia Theological Seminary President Dr. Jon Bruss replaced 
Dr. Detlev Schulz in June 2024, and Southern Illinois District (SID) 
President Rev. Heath Curtis replaced outgoing SID President Tim-
othy Scharr in December 2025. This is the first time since 2005 that 
both LCMS seminary presidents have regularly participated on the 
committee.

2026 Convention Workbook
39
OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS
by the CCPM. It also clarified that translation assistance may be 
used, where needed, for the application, interview, and seminary 
entry-level competency exam.
C.3. Additional Policy Discussions
Also, during this triennium, the CCPM discussed the “academ -
ic, theological, and personal standards” for colloquy that the com-
mittee is charged with establishing (Bylaw 3.10.2.2).
1 As it contin-
ues this discussion, the CCPM desires to act in concert with our two 
seminaries—especially in regard to personal standards—since the 
seminaries, along with the CCPM, are the three LCMS certifying 
authorities for the pastoral ministry. The CCPM has been especially 
mindful of this in its discussions of divorce and applicants with 
non-LCMS wives.
In addition to standards, the CCPM is also considering placing 
a time limit for completion of assignments given by the committee. 
Finally, though it wouldn’t be a policy, the CCPM is considering a 
flowchart that would aid district presidents in determining whether 
a potential applicant clearly fits one of the two colloquy categories. 
These and other potential policy discussions continue.
C.4. Policies Versus Bylaws
Through the policy discussions mentioned above, the CCPM 
has become aware of numerous long-standing colloquy require -
ments that were removed from the bylaws to policy by the 2010 
Synod convention. The committee has been discussing a conven-
tion overture to reinsert some of these policies into the bylaws for 
the sake of greater policy stability since policies can be changed by 
the CCPM, acting alone, at any meeting, whereas bylaw changes 
require a convention vote. As of January 2026, the CCPM is hoping 
to finalize an overture for the 2026 Synod convention, though it is 
not certain that goal will be met.
D. Bylaw 3.10.2.4—A Clarification
Various CCPM members have heard numerous times during this 
triennium that Bylaw 3.10.2.4, which precludes the possibility of 
colloquy for LCMS men who have graduated from a non-LCMS 
seminary, was new in 2023. Actually, this bylaw was adopted by the 
2016 Synod convention and only clarified in 2023 to reflect better 
the original intention.
E. Bylaw 2.5.2 Concerns
The CCPM has increasingly been concerned by the number of 
colloquy applicants who are already regularly preaching and some-
times even serving in full Word and Sacrament ministry, as the de 
facto pastor of an LCMS congregation, before even coming to the 
attention of the CCPM. Bylaw 2.5.2 stipulates that congregations 
“shall call and be served only by ordained ministers who have been 
admitted to their respective ministries in accordance with the rules 
and regulations set forth in these Bylaws. …” 
The CCPM understands that there is a wide range of meanings 
for a congregation to “be served” and that there may be extenu -
ating circumstances, such as a church plant in a language other 
than English. Yet the CCPM believes that this issue is outside of 
the committee’s authority and that a larger group, such as the full 
Council of Presidents (COP), should be aware of these situations. 
A particular challenge in such situations is that they put additional 
pressure on the CCPM to approve such applicants since such men 
are already serving in a congregation and have developed strong 
ties with their congregation.
# District # District
6 Florida-Georgia 0 Atlantic 
5 Ohio 0 California-Nevada-
Hawaii
5 Pacific Southwest 0 Central Illinois
4 Southeastern 0 Iowa East
3 Minnesota South 0 Kansas
3 Rocky Mountain 0 Montana
2 English 0 Nebraska
2 Michigan 0 New England 
2 Missouri 0 New Jersey
2 South Wisconsin 0 North Dakota
2 Texas 0 North Wisconsin
1 Eastern 0 Northwest 
1 Indiana 0 Oklahoma
1 Iowa West 0 SELC
1 Mid-South 0 South Dakota
1 Minnesota North 0 Southern Illinois
1 Northern Illinois 0 Wyoming
1 Southern
Table 3: District from which general colloquy  
applications came (February 2023–January 2026)
C. Work Performed
C.1. Meeting Schedule
During this triennium, the CCPM reduced its meeting schedule 
from five to four in-person meetings per year, occasionally sup-
plemented by a video conference to consider new applications or 
discuss policy, but not to conduct regular interviews. Most in-per -
son meetings were two days with an occasional one-day meeting 
when there were fewer applicants awaiting an interview. This meet-
ing schedule is currently sufficient for keeping up with the num-
ber of applications received. In 2025, the CCPM also began using 
BoardEffect for its meeting dockets.
C.2. Policy Revision
In June 2024, after four and a half years of work, the CCPM 
adopted a significantly revised policy manual which:
•	 reduced the length from 26 to 14 pages;
•	 sharpened the definitions of the two (long-standing) collo -
quy categories;
•	 added a requirement for applicants to submit two sermons;
•	 added a requirement for applicants to take the entry-level 
competency exam for theology from either of our two Synod 
seminaries;
•	 reduced the number of required essays from two to one; and
•	 added language to allow for a follow-up video interview, in 
some cases, after assigned work was completed.
In addition, the CCPM clarified that all applications should be 
submitted in English using the one application that is maintained

2026 Convention Workbook
40 
OFFICER, BOARD, AND COMMISSION REPORTS
pastors possible for the congregations of the Synod. The active par-
ticipation of both seminary presidents on the CCPM, the revised 
policy, application, and procedures, together with all the CCPM 
work described above, are together serving to proclaim the good 
news that Christ Is Risen Indeed!
Peter K. Lange, First Vice-President
Endnotes
1. This bylaw mandate was established in 1956. In 1995, the phrase 
“and personal” was added. Also in 1995, the bylaws began specifying four 
standards with the language, “including but not limited to…” In 2010, these 
four specific standards were transferred from the bylaws to policy, and two 
more standards were added.
2. 1992 Bylaw 6.97 (a) required one full academic year of residential 
training at an LCMS seminary, plus a vicarage, for colloquy candidates 
from other Lutheran church bodies; and Bylaw 6.97 (b) required “not less 
than two and up to three full academic years of instruction” at an LCMS 
seminary, plus a vicarage, for colloquy candidates from non-Lutheran 
Christian church bodies.

Pause and Pray at 3:07 p.m.

At 3:07 each day, remember John 15:7 and pray for Christ's Church, the convention, our leaders, and the work of the Gospel among us.

Prayer page