To Support and Clarify Prior Approval Process Rationale

Official Workbook overture source text

7-23 
To Support and Clarify Prior Approval  
Process Rationale 
Preamble 
Since the 2013 Synod convention, appointments to theological 
faculties at all universities and seminaries, as well as all college, 
university, and seminary presidential appointments, have been 
subject to the prior approval process. While the 2013 Synod 
convention amended the Bylaws to delegate the responsibility for 
prior approval to specific groups (as referenced below) the Bylaws 
did not, and still do not, stipulate how the process of prior approval 
should be carried out. Over time, this has led to questions as to the 
standards used to evaluate candidates as well as the process used by 
the prior approval panels. In the hopes of building trust and 
relieving any undue criticism of the panels and the process, the 
following overture aims to increase transparency for the process and 
standards used by the panels as well as ensuring clear 
communication between the panels, the candidates, and the Synod. 
W
HEREAS, One of the expressed  purposes of the Synod is to 
“recruit and train pastors, teachers, and other professional church 
workers and provide opportunity for their continuing growth” 
(Const. Art. III 3); and 
WHEREAS, The Synod has the responsibility to oversee that 
training; and 
WHEREAS, The Synod has designated that responsibility to the 
prior approval panels outlined in various bylaws ( Bylaws 3.6.6.1; 
3.10.5.7.3; 3.10.6.8.2; 3.10.6.9.2); and 
WHEREAS, Those panels not only have responsibility to work on 
behalf of the Synod but are also responsible to the Synod; and 
WHEREAS, Those under consideration for theological 
professorships and other positions  requiring prior approval have 
ordinarily been ordained into the Office of the Holy Ministry or 
have been commissioned and/or consecrated into an auxiliary office 
of the Church; and 
W
HEREAS, Those under consideration for aforementioned 
positions have also been examined and approved for service on the 
roster of the Synod; and 
W
HEREAS, Those individual members of the Synod have, by 
virtue of their membership in the Synod, agreed to the confessional 
basis as outlined in Constitution Article II, as well as recognized 
and affirmed the validity of Bylaw sections 1.6–1.8; therefore be it 
Resolved, That the Synod in convention give thanks to the Lord 
of the Church for using the Synod and its agencies to preserve and 
enlarge the workers of the harvest; and be it further 
Resolved
, That the Synod in convention give thanks to those 
engaged in the various prior approval processes for being engaged 
in difficult and important work; and be it further 
Resolved, That the Synod in convention require that the process, 
used by the various panels to carry out the responsibility entrusted 
to them by the Synod, be made transparent and publicly available; 
and be it finally 
Resolved, That the Concordia University System w eb page 
(cus.edu/protocols-and-procedures), which includes the Protocol 
for Pre-Approval of Concordia University Regents, Prior Approval 
of Theology Faculty at the Concordia Universities, and Process for 
the Selection of a College or University President , be expanded to 
include protocols for the seminaries. 
California-Nevada-Hawaii District 
Ov.